Our entire lives are regulated by clocks, but what they measure is less certain. How can we be sure that time actually exists? It’s time to talk to an expert, Kazuya Koyama.
The alarm goes off in the morning. You catch your morning train to the office. You take a lunch break. You catch your evening train back. You go for an hour’s run. Eat dinner. Go to bed. Repeat. Birthdays are celebrated, anniversaries chronicled, deaths commemorated. New countries are born, empires rise and fall.
The whole of human existence is bound to the passage of time. However, we can’t see it and we can’t touch it. So, how do we know that it’s really there?
“In physics, we have what we call the idea of ‘absolute time’ and it’s used to describe different changes as a sequence of events,” Koyama begins. “We use Newtonian physics to describe how things move, and time is an essential element of this.” Koyama is a Professor of Cosmology in the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation at the University of Portsmouth.
To this day, classic Newtonian thought on time – where time is constant throughout the universe – is still a good approximation of how humans experience time in their daily lives. We all experience time in the same way and we all synchronize our clocks in the same way, no matter where we are in the world, whether that be London, Tokyo, New York, or Buenos Aires.
There’s no time without space
Physicists though have discovered that time can actually behave differently and is not as consistent as Newton thought.
“When we speak of time, we need to think of space as well – they come in a package together,” Koyama says. “We cannot disconnect the two, and the way that an object moves through space determines how it experiences time.”
In short, the time you experience depends on your velocity through space as the observer. This works as outlined through Einstein’s special relativity, a theory of how speed impacts mass, time, and space. Additionally, according to Einstein’s general theory of relativity, the gravity of a massive object can impact how quickly time passes. Many experiments have been undertaken that have since proven this to be true.
Physicists have even found that black holes warp the immediate space-time around them due to their immense gravitational fields. Supported by the European Research Council, Koyama continues to investigate this theory.
“A good, solid example to get your head around all of this is to look at how we use GPS,” Koyama continues. “GPS works due to a network of satellites orbiting the Earth. They’re placed at a very high altitude and thus the gravity they experience is weaker. Therefore, time should actually go faster for them than it does for us on the ground, where we experience higher gravity. But because the satellites are traveling at very high speeds around the planet, this in effect helps to slow time down, compensating for the lack of gravity.”
Understanding how these two effects work and influence each other is essential for ensuring that the global GPS network functions correctly. And a crucial ingredient in this is a consistent theory of time that explains how objects move. So clocks aren’t telling us falsehoods: time indeed exists outside of our own perception.
Could we ever go backward in time?
Finally, the question of whether time travel could one day be possible had to be put before Koyama. As a professor of cosmology at the University of Portsmouth, he is best placed to tell us the truth.
“I’m sorry to disappoint you but for time travel to be possible, we would need to discover a completely new type of matter that has the power to change the curvature of time and space,” Koyama says. “Such matter would require properties that simply do not exist in nature. We physicists strongly believe that going back to the past is simply impossible – but it’s nice to fantasize about it.”
Click here to find out more about Koyama’s research: Challenging the general theory of relativity
Time is a concept, not a ‘thing’ that can have existence. All processes proceed in the present moment. Our theories about time, like all our ideas, are recorded, and are reviewed and revised or rejected by thought processes, always in the present moment. We call time a dimension because temporality appears similar to dimensionality. We don’t actually measure time. We compare observed portions of processes to other processes which have frequency, or a constant behavior: clocks, orbiting planets, and biorhythms are a few examples. No process is measurable except by comparison with some other process. And comparison is performed in the present moment. Because ‘time’ is not a dimension, neither we, or any real objects, may travel along it. We should accept that time is simply an extremely handy illusion. The experience, and the thrill, are in the Now.
I say time is only a relative perception of one “thing” to another..without at least two functions of relative comparison time does not exist…so..it would be a perception of the human condition..without that perception there is no past and no future..just a stationary dynamic..since we can’t become beings with alternate senses..so called “time” will always exist for us !!..
time a concept was created by man to solve a every day problem.
Space just is and time just isn’t: based upon particular personal ‘insights’ in 2009 (e.g. Nikola Tesla and the 3-phase AC electric motor, in his day), General Relativity still standing, in my model of the universe some still unidentified stimulus induces pulsing directional lines of gravity force to radiate from all objects in generally spherical fields of decreasing density and strength and, therefore, what is generally labeled as “time” is actually an incredibility rapid series of incredibly brief “now moments” interspaced with a probably equal number of incredibly brief “intervals.” When scientists demonstrate that time moving at high speed at a high altitude slows down, they are actually proving that clocks (even atomic ones) slow down when forced to move more rapidly through the “drag” of even fewer lines of still dense gravity force. Consequently, all estimates of the age and size of the universe need to be recalculated and, based upon the inverse-square law, what appears to be “gravity waves” in “space-time” needs to be reexamined, as there are too few individual lines of gravity force in deep space for any gravity waves to exist, let alone travel, to a very geologically active planet with only ground-based detectors available to try to sense them.